Packaging decisions are usually made by people thinking about the product, the shelf and the printer. The pallet enters the conversation last, by which point the case dimensions are fixed — and a case that does not tile cleanly onto 48 by 40 inches will waste space on every pallet of that product ever shipped.
The tiling problem
A 48×40 deck is 1,920 square inches. A case footprint that divides into that cleanly — 12 by 10, 16 by 10, 12 by 8 — gives you a full layer with no voids. A case that is 13 by 11 inches gives you a pattern with gaps, a less stable load, and about eight percent fewer units per layer.
Eight percent fewer units per layer is eight percent more pallets, more trailers, more handling and more freight — permanently, for the life of that pack.
Work in this order
- 1 · Confirm the pallet footprint you can actually buy in volume locally.
- 2 · Confirm your rack bay and any lift or doorway on the route.
- 3 · Choose a case footprint that tiles onto the pallet with no voids.
- 4 · Choose a case height that gives a layer count fitting your rack clear height.
- 5 · Design the graphics last. Printers are flexible; rack steel is not.
Overhang and underhang
Overhang damages product and invites forklift contact; a load overhanging by an inch per side loses a disproportionate share of its compression strength. Underhang wastes cube and reduces stability because the load does not reach the deck edge where the pallet is best supported. Flush, or within half an inch, is the target.
A worked example
A customer shipping a 13 × 10.5 inch case got nine per layer with visible gaps. Trimming the case to 12 × 10 gave sixteen per layer, flush to the deck edges, with a measurably more stable load. Same product, same pallet, 78% more units per layer — and the change cost one conversation with their carton supplier.
If you are designing a new pack, send us the case dimensions before you commit to tooling. It takes ten minutes to check the tiling, and it is the cheapest packaging consultancy you will ever get.
Written at the Meeks Blvd yard, St. Louis, and published on June 16, 2026. Markets and specifications move; if a figure here no longer matches what you are seeing, tell us and we will update it. Our model constants live on the Carbon Ledger.
How this was written
Drafted at the grading line from our own weighbridge records, line notes and customer correspondence. Figures quoted as ours are measured; figures quoted from the wider industry are labelled as estimates. Nothing here was written to rank for a search term, and we correct articles rather than quietly deleting them.
- Author
- Yard desk
- Published
- June 16, 2026
- Category
- How-to
- Reviewed
- Annually, with the model constants
- Corrections to
- sales@repalletshop.com
What to do with this
- Check the figures against your own invoices before acting on them.
- Ask us for the underlying scale tickets if you need audit evidence.
- Send the article to whoever owns your pallet spec — most of this is their decision.
- Disagree in writing. Several of these pieces exist because a customer corrected us.
How to cite
Yard desk, “Design the packaging around the pallet, not the other way round”, Repallet Shop, June 16, 2026. repalletshop.com/blog/design-packaging-around-the-pallet